Colorado Elections – A Risky Business
By Nancy Murray
(Updated January 7, 2026)
This article was originally published on July 28, 2025. As new information becomes available in relation in Election Integrity that is applicable to Colorado, it will be added to this article with the most recent at the top. Thank you for taking an interest in fixing our elections in Colorado.
December 31, 2025
Mark Cook goes into detail on some of the major security issues with Dominion and points out the many times John Poulos, with Dominion, perjured himself during testimony before the Michigan Legislature in December 2020.
December 22, 2025
Garland Favorito with Voter GA presents his lawsuit against the Elections Commission to decertify the Dominion machines. He talks extensively about election corruption in Colorado and Tina Peters at about the 24-minute mark. He also addresses the Colorado County Commissioners Association’s rebuttal to the Mesa reports.
December 5, 2025
Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, granted a full and unconditional pardon to Tina Peters pursuant to his powers under the Article II of the U.S. Constitution; and (2) because Mrs. Peters was performing her federal duty to preserve federal election records under 52 U.S.C. 20702, the Supremacy Clause, Article VI Clause 2, of the U.S. Constitution deprives state courts of jurisdiction to prosecute her.
December 2, 2025
Rocky Mountain Voice article on the Response to the Colorado County Commissioners Association’s letter. Clerks vs. the Constitution: Why the CCCA’s Letter to Polis Gets It Wrong.
November 25, 2025
Stolen Elections – 14 ways to steal an election.
Per Patrick Colbeck, “The investigation by Gary Berntsen and Martin Rodil resulted in the recruitment of over a dozen whistleblowers with direct knowledge of how the Smartmatic Automated Electoral Solution (SAES) was used to alter election results. These whistleblowers identified 14 core mechanisms inherent in the SAES Architecture that were used in varying combinations to subvert the integrity of our elections.”
Smartmatic software is the operating system software originally developed in Venezuela and resides on most election equipment in the country, to include all election machines in Colorado. Details on the investigation can be found at Stolen Elections or in the book Stolen Elections The Takedown of Democracies Worldwide by Ralph Pezzullo. Whistleblower testimony can be found at
November 23, 2025
President Trump retruth’s Lara Logan’s interview with ex-CIA Officer concerning the whistleblowers from Venezuela explaining how Serbia controls the US elections with the software used on most election equipment in the US and 72 other countries. The software was originally developed in Venezuela.
November 21, 2025
Lara Logan posted an interview with the investigator and the author of the book Stolen Elections, Gary Bernsten and Ralph Pezullo. The interview is based on the book Stolen Elections The Takedown of Democracies Worldwide by Ralph Pezzullo. The book goes into detail on the methods used to steal elections around the world to include the United States using election equipment used across the nation to include Colorado.
November 15, 2025
Peter Ticktin discloses that Stephanie Lambert, Defense Attorney for Patrick Byrne, discovered that Dominion machines have cell phone chips.
November 27, 2025
Joe Oltmann posted a short video of Mark Cook with Handcount Roadshow and a citizen of Colorado, demonstrates in 2022 how ballots were created in 2020 remotely for several states using election machines.
November 10, 2025
Ed Solomon’s analysis of the 2024 Election Abortion measures, including El Paso County. The analysis mirrors the analysis on Proposition B, which repealed the Gallagher Amendment in Arapahoe County (details below). He estimates that the likelihood of Colorado voters voting in this manner is 10 to the power of 20. This is now two state wide propositions (making abortions a constitutional right and the repeal of the Gallagher Amendment) that were controlled by an algorithm and do not accurately reflect the wishes of the voters of Colorado.
October 24, 2025
In this episode of Why We Vote, Ashe in America is joined by Colonel Shawn Smith (ret) (Cause of America), both from Colorado, to dissect the Colorado County Clerks Association’s latest attempt to “debunk” the Mesa County elections reports. Together they expose the false claims and inaccuracies used to cover up the election vulnerabilities in Colorado. They expose how Colorado’s voting systems violate federal standards and why operating systems logs are in fact crucial election records but are not recording changes to the system as required by law.
October 21, 2025
Sharyl Attkisson published an interview with the author of the new book called “Stolen Elections, The Takedown of Democracies Worldwide.” It is a book that was self-published by the author Ralph Pezzullo. The book includes updates as recent as summer 2025. The book exposes how foreign countries, such as Venezuela, Serbia, and China, circumvented our elections through the various elections systems used across the US. It is based on the information provided by Venezuelan whistleblowers that were employed by election equipment companies. You can access the interview on Sharyl Attkisson’s website.
October 21, 2025
John Case, Tina Peter’s lawyer wrote an open letter to Colorado Governor Polis and Secretary of State, Jena Griswold, exposing the issues with the equipment used in Colorado elections. The letter is based on the testimony of the Venezuelan whistleblower. The full testimony of the whistleblower is available for all to read and was submitted as an exhibit in Tina Peter’s case.
With this latest information, every citizen in the country should be concerned about how our elections are ran and why election officials are still endorsing the use of election equipment that is obviously compromised. Maybe this is the real reason Venezuela is in the news lately.
October 13, 2025
Marly Hornik’s group, NY Citizens Audit Civic Fund, Inc., sued the NY Attorney General for violation of their civil rights. Visit RealAmerica.Vote to read the lawsuit or watch a 30 minute video summarizing the contents of the lawsuit. The lawsuit outlines all the issues the citizen auditors found with relation to the New York voter rolls. These issues were identified to the Attorney General and other election officials for corrective action. Instead of fixing the problems identified, the Attorney General opened an investigation into the Citizens Audit group under the KKK law. If these voter roll issues are happening in New York, they are most likely happening around the country. Most of the issues identified in the lawsuit are related to the voter rolls, but it also touches on the campaign money laundering operation called Smurfing, where identities are stolen and used to make extensive donations to politicians.
These issues identified in New York are reflective of the lawsuit Judicial Watch filed against Colorado and and settled in 2023, requiring Colorado to maintain their voter rolls in compliance with the National Voter Registration Act of 1993. According to the lawsuit originally filed in 2020 “A 2019 study showed that 40 of Colorado’s 64 counties had voter registration rates exceeding 100% of the eligible citizen voting-age population. The share of Colorado counties with registration rates exceeding 100% was the highest in the nation.”
A recent analysis of the Colorado Voter Rolls by Dr. Douglas G. Frank (@DrFrankModels on X) an Election Integrity Advocate and Scientist, shows that many counties still exceed 100% of the voting age population which is in violation of the Judicial Watch settlement. For example, Mesa County is at 106%.
October 9, 2025
Liberty Vote purchased Dominion Voting Systems. The new owner is Scott Leiendecker “a former Republican election official with over 25 years experience in the field.” Leiendecker is also the owner of KNOWiNK, a troubled company and leading provider of electronic poll devices. What does this mean for Colorado elections? It isn’t clear yet, but we do know that the source code remains foreign owned (Venezuela – sworn testimony of whistle blowers) and has never been analyzed by a qualified third-party as testified by Clay Parikh, a cyber security expert with eight years experience working in voting systems test lab. Analysis and testing of the code by a third-party is standard procedure for critical infrastructure and weapons systems.
Leiendecker said that he will conduct third party audits of elections to build confidence in the system, but the Colorado Secretary of State only allows Risk-Limiting Audits and Logic and Accuracy testing, both of which are very limited in scope and does not audit the full election process. Leiendecker also states that he will use hand-marked paper ballots, but Colorado already has this and they will still be counted by his machines with code that has never been reviewed by a qualified third-party.
September 2, 2025
President Trump announces he is moving Space Command from Colorado Springs to Huntsville, AL. One of his reasons for doing so is that “Colorado has all mail-in voting so they have automatically crooked elections and we can’t have that. When a state has mail-in voting that means they want dishonest elections, so that played a big factor also.”
There were several editorials and letters to the editor on how our politicians failed Colorado in keeping Space Command in Colorado Springs. You can read the Editorial Board’s OPED and Nancy Murray’s response in the ongoing article on this site titled Letters to the Editor on Election Integrity.
August 18, 2025
President Trump Announcement on Eliminating Mail-in Ballots and Election Machines to Count the Ballots (TruthSocial)
Everyone in the election integrity movement agrees with President Trump’s assessment of our elections, particularly regarding the use of mail-in ballots and machines to count votes. Be wary of those who oppose these efforts, as their resistance may indicate they are benefiting from these methods!
Should Colorado sacrifice the convenience of mail-in ballots for the sake of transparency, security, and increased election system costs?
There are significant trade-offs associated with the convenience of mail-in ballots, one of the most critical being that it is harder to rig an election without them.
Complexity and Cost
The complexity and cost of using machines to count mail-in ballots are notable. As a poll watcher in El Paso County, CO, I have observed the ballot processing and counting rooms. By my count, every ballot or envelope is touched or reviewed by a human at least 11 times during each election, with more reviews required for overseas ballots or in cases of issues such as personal information written on the ballot, incorrect household member signing the wrong ballot envelope, missing signatures on envelopes, or multiple ballots in one envelope. This process is not designed for efficiency.
The actual cost of running elections in El Paso County remains obscured because many costs are hidden, such as the required office space for equipment, the manpower needed to maintain the equipment throughout numerous elections, and the actual expenses related to printing, mailing, receiving, counting, and storing all of the ballots and envelopes. South Dakota estimates that the cost of counting ballots at a central location using machines is more than double that of one-day voting at the precinct level with hand-counting. The use of machines does not represent a cost-saving measure.
The CO Secretary of State (SOS) and County Clerks may argue that they struggle to hire the necessary manpower to execute elections. However, they have extended the election day into a season, with early voting starting weeks before election day. If early voting were limited to one week and votes were counted by hand on Election Day at the precinct level, the required manpower would be significantly reduced. Instead of working three weeks straight, 5-8 hours a day as an election judge, this could be reduced to perhaps one week or one day for most judges. I am confident that the Clerks could find the necessary manpower to support our elections, especially if election day were made a holiday, allowing high school students to participate and earn community service credit.
Lack of Transparency in our elections
Elections are required to be free, fair, and transparent, but the CO SOS now requires her approval to conduct a forensic audit to verify that the paper ballots match the Cast Vote Records (CVRs). The CVR is produced by the election machine when ballots are scanned, and votes are tabulated on the CVR, which looks and functions like a large spreadsheet.
We are expected to accept the “Risk Limiting Audit” as a legitimate audit, yet it merely tests a small, predetermined number of ballots to verify that they are accurately tabulated. To my knowledge, an actual audit comparing the paper ballots of a complete race to the CVRs has never occurred in CO, even though that is what Tina Peters, candidate for SOS in 2022, funded in her recount and was authorized at the time according to state statute. The SOS, Jena Griswold, forced her to use the machines for her recount.
In January 2017, President Obama’s Homeland Security Secretary classified all election equipment as critical infrastructure. The recent release of the Declassified Durham Annex has revealed that this idea originated from an employee of George Soros’ Open Society, reportedly for nefarious reasons. This designation facilitated the centralization of cybersecurity efforts for all election equipment, potentially allowing bad actors to access the machines and manipulate election results. Patrick Colbeck from Michigan discusses this process on the podcast “Badlands.”
Department of Defense (DOD) systems, also classified as critical infrastructure, are never touched by foreign nationals. All machine code is evaluated by a third party, and a separate third-party organization tests the code. In contrast, our election machines have never undergone such scrutiny. All election equipment in Colorado was produced in China. Thanks to Sheriff Dar Leaf of Michigan, who obtained Dominion emails related to an ongoing investigation, we now have evidence that Dominion employs programmers from Serbia. Moreover, the code has never been evaluated by a third party, and states face heavy fines if they turn their code or machines over to another party as we have witnessed with the prosecution of Tina Peters of Mesa County. These machines, supposedly just vote-adding machines, are shielded from scrutiny. In the emails that Sheriff Leaf shared, there is an exchange between representatives of Dominion election systems and the State of Michigan, where the Michigan representative asks Dominion what “algorithm” is used when counting ballots using Rank Choice Voting. There should be no “algorithms” involved in simply counting ballots. Consequently, the State of Michigan is a subject of Sheriff Leaf’s investigation.
Election Security
There are numerous issues related to ballot security. Opponents of mail-in voting have long argued that once ballots are printed and mailed, there is no chain of custody until they are received at the processing center. This vulnerability can lead to undelivered ballots being collected and illegally voted—a practice for which there are recent examples of people being charged and convicted.
Heidi Ganahl, a candidate for Colorado Governor in 2022, revealed that during her analysis of undelivered ballots by the U.S. Postal Service, 9 out of the 11 counties they reviewed did not reconcile the number of undelivered ballots with the invoices provided by the Postal Service. This discrepancy suggests a potential for thousands of unaccounted-for ballots.
When a ballot is voted by an unauthorized person, some might argue that the signature on the envelope would not match the voter’s record and thus would not be counted. However, we have seen videos from Arizona showing election judges approving every unmatched signature flagged by machines, thereby allowing these ballots to be counted. Additionally, the initial scan of the signature can be conducted automatically by the machines, and there have been cases where the sensitivity of the signature match was lowered or turned off, further enabling the counting of illegally voted ballots.
Arizona State Representative Wendy Rogers recently requested that the Department of Justice (DOJ) investigate elections in Arizona, particularly in Maricopa County. Following the 2020 election, an extensive “forensic” audit was conducted in Maricopa County. The media quickly reported that the number of ballots matched the number of votes. However, they failed to mention that an estimated 80% of the ballot storage boxes had broken seals before the audit. This chain of custody failure should have halted the audit and been reported to the DOJ and FBI. Yet, under the previous administration, it likely would not have been investigated.
Ballot box security is another issue. Through Heidi Ganahl’s research, it was discovered that many of the ballot boxes have inadequate video quality and camera placement, rendering them ineffective for monitoring ballot harvesting. Additionally, it was found that County Clerk staff never review the video footage.
In our state of Colorado, Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters is currently in jail for fulfilling her duties as Clerk and Recorder. She performed the required backups of her machines before a scheduled update mandated by the CO SOS in April 2021. After the update, she conducted another backup and had both backups evaluated to ensure that her election data was preserved. It was discovered that the update, known as the “Trusted Build”, overwrote all election data, thereby violating both the federal requirement of 22 months and the state requirement of 25 months. Rather than investigating Tina Peters’ findings, CO Secretary of State Jena Griswold and State Attorney General Phil Weiser charged her with multiple crimes. The term “Tina Peter’d” has now become synonymous with the suppression of election inquiries by Colorado County Clerks.
We have often heard the claim that “election machines are not connected to the internet.” However, thanks to Sheriff Dar Leaf, we now have documentation showing that Dominion machines in Alaska were equipped with modems just in time for the 2020 Presidential election.
Tina Peters, the former Mesa County Clerk, revealed that her election machines contained 36 modems installed during manufacturing, of which she was unaware. Heidi Ganahl discovered through a CORA that the Douglass County voting machines were purchased with wireless network cards in violation of certification requirements. This issue is likely prevalent in other Colorado counties as well.
It remains unclear El Paso County staff, Dominion employees, or other contractors provide technical support for Dominion machines. Each county should have at least one qualified cybersecurity expert on staff, rather than relying solely on contractors, to ensure the security of their election systems. Given that these systems are classified as critical infrastructure, they should be maintained to the same standards as Defense systems.
Voter Roll Issues
Colorado’s voter rolls pose a significant security risk, particularly with mail-in elections. In October 2020, Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit against the Colorado SOS due to inflated voter rolls. Several counties in Colorado reported registration rates exceeding 100% of eligible voters. Judicial Watch won the lawsuit, and the SOS was required to manage the voter rolls in accordance with federal law.
Despite this ruling, the SOS has failed to implement the necessary controls to maintain the integrity of the voter rolls. United Sovereign America announced in July 2025 that it would file another lawsuit against Colorado, alleging that over 58,000 voters cast ballots in the 2022 election before they were registered to vote. Additionally, nearly 35,000 more votes were counted than the number of voters who voted. This issue is not unique to Colorado; in no state did the official number of ballots counted match the number of recorded voters in the database. In some cases, over 100,000 more ballots were counted than the number of voters who cast their votes. United Sovereign America concludes that “millions of votes across the country, certified as accurate by election officials, originate from registrations that appear to violate election laws”. The United Sovereign America scorecard for the 2022 Colorado election can be viewed at: Colorado 2022 Election Scorecard.
Centralizing elections at one county voting center exacerbates the problem. When the number of votes exceeds the number of voters who cast ballots (identified in the lawsuit above), how can discrepancies be reconciled? Where does one begin? Do you even try? Do you even notice? Decentralizing the counting to the precinct level offers more control over identifying errors, issuing and receiving ballots with voter ID, and counting ballots under the watch of cameras and observers.
Motor Voter registration dilutes the party makeup of every county in the state. When someone visits the DMV to obtain a driver’s license, they are allowed to register to vote. If they choose not to register, they must “opt out.” If they do not select a party, they are automatically registered as unaffiliated. They will receive both Republican and Democratic ballots during open primaries, although they are only allowed to vote one ballot. Open primaries present another issue, but this process deliberately impacts the party makeup. According to the El Paso County Clerk’s Office, between January 6, 2025, and July 21, 2025, Republicans lost 671 registered voters, Democrats lost 565 registered voters, and Unaffiliated gained 13,386 registered voters. Currently, Unaffiliated voters make up 51.68% of active registered voters, Republicans 28.94%, and Democrats 16.7%, despite El Paso County being considered the reddest county in Colorado.
Election Equipment BIOS Password Breach
Those who followed the 2024 general election closely are aware of the BIOS password breach by Jena Griswold, the Colorado SOS. It was discovered that the BIOS passwords for all election equipment across Colorado’s 62 of 64 counties were posted on the SOS’s website, likely for months before the election, and were discovered and reported during early voting. After acknowledging the breach, the SOS’s solution was to send staff to every affected county to change the passwords.
To truly secure the elections, the clerks should have been instructed to reinstall the software and restart the counting process. However, this was not the directive given by the SOS. Instead, the passwords were changed, and the counting resumed from where it had left off. There was no attempt to review the logs or determine if anyone had accessed the equipment using the compromised passwords, if that were even possible. Quoting from the El Paso County Minority Report for the 2024 election by the Republican Canvass Board Member, Candice Stutzreim, “We have potentially compromised the outcome of both the 2024 primary and general elections in this county and across Colorado. The consequences of the BIOS password breach are inestimable.” The SOS faced no repercussions, yet she arrested Tina Peters, the Mesa County Clerk, for leaking one partial and expired password. She also mandated the replacement of all Mesa County equipment due to the leaked partially expired password.
I had the opportunity to observe a demonstration of a backup copy of a Mesa County Dominion machine with Wayne Williams, the former Secretary of State for Colorado, a previous Colorado Springs City Council member, a candidate for Colorado Springs mayor, and a consultant for Runbeck (the former ballot printer for El Paso County, which still maintains the ballot sorting and signature verification equipment).
During the demonstration of the 2020 Mesa County election machine backup, we observed unauthorized access to the database for the 2020 general election without entering any passwords. This allowed changes to the vote count between Biden and Trump, which altered the winner, and then reversed the changes. None of these actions was logged in the system—a major violation for any system, especially one classified as “critical infrastructure”. This system configuration would permit anyone to access the equipment, alter the vote counts in the database, and remain undetected because no password was required, and the changes were not recorded in the system log. This was the configuration in every county in Colorado during the 2020 election and likely remains so today. I documented this demonstration with Mr. Williams in a Memorandum for the Record and provided a copy to Steve Schleiker, the El Paso County Clerk. To my knowledge, neither has addressed these vulnerabilities. The SOS is aware of these vulnerabilities and exacerbated the problem by posting every BIOS password for every Colorado Dominion machine, as discussed above. One must question why all these security violations with our voting systems are allowed—there is only one answer, it is deliberate!
Now are you putting the puzzle together on how Colorado turned deep blue in a matter of 12-15 years? Still not convinced, read on.
Arapahoe County Election Fraud
In 2020, Colorado voters reportedly approved Proposition B, which repealed the Gallagher Amendment, with 57.6% of the vote. However, there are reasons to question the validity of these results.
The Gallagher Amendment, enacted in 1982, aimed to limit the state’s tax burden to 45% of residential property tax revenue, with commercial properties covering the remaining 55%. The amendment was designed to protect homeowners from rising property taxes during periods of high inflation and growth. With its repeal in 2020, property taxes in Colorado have skyrocketed.
In preparation for a court case in Nevada, where election results for Rank Choice Voting were being challenged, a mathematician named Ed Solomon (@kingsolomon006 on X) analyzed the Cast Vote Records (CVRs) and discovered a highly unusual and statistically impossible pattern in voting. He found that Republicans and Democrats voted in lockstep on the issue. To determine if this was an isolated incident, Solomon examined similar elections on issues in counties with similar demographics. He discovered the same unlikely pattern in the 2020 Arapahoe County CVRs for the Gallagher Amendment Repeal (Proposition B). To avoid misrepresenting his findings, I will include his exact analysis from his article:
“And this is where the impossible happens. At every point in time, Republicans (defined as Trump voters in the State-Certified Cast Vote Record) and Democrats (defined as Biden voters in the State-Certified Cast Vote Record) voted identically on Proposition B!
● When Republican opposition rose to 49%, so did Democrat opposition rise to 49% (see time = 12%).
● When Democrat opposition dropped to 36%, Republicans mirrored that exact drop (see time = 51%).”
This perfect lockstep is an event so rare that its probability is 1 in 10¹¹⁰ — that’s a 1 followed by 110 zeros! For comparison, the number of protons in the universe is approximately 1080 !
So why does this matter for Nevada? Because it matters for all elections in the modern digital age. It demonstrates that Mass Statewide Algorithmic Election Fraud is not only possible, but has already occurred, and it has evaded the Risk-Limiting Audit Procedure.”
He continued “And Arapahoe County wasn’t the only place where Proposition B was manipulated—it’s just the easiest county to explain. That being said, Arapahoe County played the most pivotal role by providing the largest number of fraudulent Yes votes, ultimately pushing through this highly unpopular measure.
The Arapahoe manipulation involved flipping 23,031 No votes to Yes votes — which when doubled (since each flip removes a No and adds a Yes) creates a 46,062-vote margin that helped secure Proposition B’s passage.”
Even though we had the Cast Vote Record of Arapahoe County’s 2020 General Election for nearly four years, it wasn’t until March of 2024 that we discovered this manipulation. When looking at the Yes-to-No Ratio without separating the votes by presidential choice nothing seemed out of the ordinary in Arapahoe County’s election.
This illustrates an important point: Election fraud of this scale is not limited to Arapahoe County, Colorado. Instead, it highlights how difficult it is to detect the specific vote combinations used to rig an election, even when there are overwhelming signs of mid-level anomalies readily visible throughout the data. This is why it is so hard to spot fraud on this scale — it is cleverly hidden within the data, disguised by seemingly insignificant patterns that, when combined, create the perfect cover for manipulation.
While documenting how Mr. Ed Solomon identified an anomaly in the voting patterns for the 2020 Gallagher Amendment Repeal (Proposition B) in Arapahoe County, he discovered that the county revised its 2020 Cast Vote Records (CVRs) earlier this year, over four years after the election was certified, without changing the file date. This raises the question: Why would they do this? Mr. Solomon believes that Arapahoe County was attempting to set him up for a perjury charge, alleging that he lied under oath during the Nevada trial, which was expected to be heard earlier in July but is currently delayed. Fortunately, by discovering this change to the CVRs before the Nevada hearing, Mr. Solomon was able to report the document manipulation to the FBI. It is worth noting that the Arapahoe County Clerk once worked for Dominion. It would not be surprising if this issue is revisited at the highest levels soon.
What other issues may have passed using this parallel voting pattern, which requires special code within the election equipment? Mr. Solomon believes that abortion-related topics around the country were passed using this algorithm. Rank Choice Voting was fortunately defeated in Colorado in November 2024 (perhaps we have Jena Griswold and her password leak to thank for this); however, this algorithm was likely deployed in some of the larger blue counties.
Tina Peters is an Election Integrity Hero.
Tina Peters, the former Mesa County Clerk, is currently in jail because she was at the forefront of exposing alleged election corruption in Colorado. The SOS could not risk further exposure, and the threat of being “Tina Peter’d” has been sufficient to deter other county clerks from scrutinizing their elections too closely.
The three forensic reports, available on TinaPeters.us, analyzed the before-and-after backup copies of her elections. (Col Shawn Smith (Ret), Air Force, created quick videos to summarize each report.) It was discovered that the election histories, which she is required to retain for 25 months, were overwritten by the “Trusted Build” approved and installed by the SOS and Dominion. This not only violates Colorado state law but also federal law. The overwriting of these histories makes it impossible to conduct a forensic audit. The analysis of Tina’s backups also revealed that databases were deleted and recreated, containing only a portion of the previously scanned images and vote tallies. While it is not certain that what occurred with Tina’s machines can be directly linked to what happened in Arapahoe County, it seems logical to consider a connection.
I encourage everyone who is skeptical about how Tina Peters was treated during her trial to watch her sentencing hearing, which was presided over by Judge Barrett in Mesa County. During the hearing, Tina Peters discusses some of the evidence that she was unable to present to the jury. The judge admitted that she received a sentence that was much harsher than anticipated or expected, to prevent her from discussing election fraud during her numerous media appearances. Tina Peters is currently appealing her conviction for several reasons, including the inability to present evidence in her defense and the alleged suppression of her First Amendment Rights.
Given this information and evidence, the integrity of Colorado election results has been in question since the introduction of election machines in 2007 and the Dominion machines in 2015, introduced by Wayne Williams, the previous CO SOS. A comprehensive analysis of the election systems used in Colorado needs to be conducted by an independent third party to restore confidence in their use or to consider removing them from Colorado elections altogether.
President Trump’s Executive Order on Elections
I wrote this article to educate the public about the issues with elections in Colorado and around the country, and to prepare them for what I believe will be significant changes to Federal elections in the very near future. President Trump has already issued an Executive Order on elections and hinted at eliminating the election equipment. No, he didn’t say that specifically, but he did say that the standards are to be updated, and all election equipment must meet the new standards to be certified and used in Federal elections. The deadline for implementing the new standards and certifying the equipment is six months from the date of the Executive Order, March 25, 2025.
This five-year-old video on why electronic voting is a bad idea, is still applicable today because the election systems in CO and around the nation have not improved.
CIA’s Involvement in Overturning Elections
Patrick Byrne, currently working through the courts in a defamation lawsuit with Dominion, went on InfoWars with Alex Jones on August 11, 2025, and reported that DOGE has mapped out the funding of election fraud from CIA to their USAID non-profit (CEPPS) to George Soro’s Open Society and China. This funding, originating from the CIA, was used to over throw elections in 26 countries since 2009, to include the US.
I hope I have convinced you that elections in Colorado and across the nation should discontinue the use of electronic voting machines for counting ballots. This change is necessary to restore trust in the ballot counting process and, ultimately, in the results of future elections. Once the machines are decertified and voting is conducted at the precinct level on Election Day, everyone is encouraged to participate in their local elections. You can do so as a paid Election Judge through the County Clerk’s Office or as a volunteer Poll Watcher for a candidate or political party.
Stolen Elections Timeline
Everyone is encouraged to listen to the podcast Untamed by Joe Oltmann and Mark Cook discussing the timeline of Stolen Elections Facts. They discuss in detail, how the election machines can be programmed in such a way that even evaluating the source code, which has never occurred, can not detect the machines being programmed in such a way that elections are stolen out from under the peoples’ noses – even election officials’ noses. The discussion starts with Joe’s first report of the evidence he has uncovered that support his claim that the election machines are programmed to produce results contrary to how the people vote. Our elections are stolen across the nation.
El Paso and Teller County District Attorney – Refused to Investigate Election Fraud
I was surprised to hear of another case of election fraud that occurred in Teller County during the 2023 Fire District election. The Fire Chief at the time, Erik Holt, reviewed hours of video of the election conducted in his station after a voter reported a conversation they overheard of an election watcher on his phone. He identified several instances of election watchers coordinating and collaborating on getting voters into the station to vote and tallying up the vote. The five-member board was flipped to all Democrats. When Chief Holt presented the evidence to the County District Attorney, Michael Allen (shared with El Paso), Mr. Allen dismissed the case. When the board was installed, they froze the Fire Chief’s bank account and then fired him for not paying the bills. After selling his home, Chief Holt filed a lawsuit for wrongful termination, but he has run out of money and is now representing himself in his appeal. You can help him recover from some of his financial loss by giving to his GiveSendGo. He no longer resides in Colorado and has decided to make his case publicly.
————–
Nancy Murray is a retired Navy Commander who holds a Master’s Degree in Computers Systems Management from the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, CA. She achieved Level II certification in Program Management and, while assigned to the U.S. Transportation Command, managed the legacy Global Transportation Network (GTN) at Scott Air Force Base, IL. Her final assignment was at U.S. Northern Command in Colorado Springs, where she oversaw the Information Technology budget for NORAD and NORTHCOM. She retired from the Navy in 2005.
In 2006, Nancy became a licensed real estate agent and is currently in the process of retiring from that profession. She remains actively involved in Republican politics and has developed a keen interest in election Integrity, particularly following the 2020 election and other election-related issues across the country.